HB 1486 TESTIMONY
Senate Ag Committee  --  March 6, 2003 -- Presented by Keith Brandt

           The Grain Dealers Association opposes this bill.  The Wheat Commission is against it due to expected increased refunding, use of and accountability for funds.  We agree.  We also don’t think it is the business of the grain elevators and Commission to collect dues for private organizations that over 90% of wheat growers have not voluntarily joined.  Grain Growers and Durum Growers have said their memberships are about 1500, and some of that is double-counted because of dual memberships.  There are about 20,000 wheat producers in ND.

We do not want to see the core programs of the Wheat Commission in market development, product promotion and research jeopardized by increased refunding.  That is not good for farmers, grain elevators or the state.

            The Grain Dealers Board of Directors met with representatives of the Grain Growers and Durum Growers Associations prior to our convention in January.  Later in the convention our delegate body of farmers and managers unanimously passed a resolution in opposition to the bill, in concurrence with the Commission. 

That resolution is part of this testimony.  It points out the 40-year cooperative and productive relationship of the Wheat Commission and Grain Dealers Association, working together and supporting each other on product promotion, railroad, grain quality, and other issues.  The resolution plainly states why we have a vested interest.  Country grain elevators have collected that Wheat Commission checkoff since 1959.  They take part in hosting trade teams that develop or enhance wheat marketing.  They participate in various quality surveys. Our elevators enjoy increased sales due to Commission activity.  We do not want to risk farmer dissatisfaction due to an untimely checkoff increase and its diversion to other uses. 

            HB 1486 is a unique concept in North Dakota commodity checkoffs, in that it mandates in the statute a portion of the checkoff to be distributed to private groups.  We doubt the wisdom of setting such a precedent.  Where is the accountability for these funds?  And maybe other groups deserve a share -  Farm Bureau, Farmers Union, or Grain Dealers.  

            Elevator managers are the front line of defense for checkoff groups.  When the farmer questions why that levy has been taken off, most elevator managers point out the product promotion work being done and discourage refunding.  Our members don’t want to be put in the position of collecting funds for lobbying on farm policy issues many growers don’t agree with.  We’ve heard from several managers who think that this bill will increase refunding and may be a net loss to the Commission. 

            We urge a Do Not Pass on HB 1486.   I’ll try to answer any questions you might have.